Wind Energy Committee considers feasibility 
          of   town-owned wind turbine.
          
          - 11 November 2009
          Ft. Getty and Taylor Point have emerged as   the “finalists” in  Jamestown’s search for potential wind turbine   sites. During a Nov. 10  workshop on a newly released feasibility study,   the Jamestown Wind  Energy Committee announced that the other   front-runner, Beavertail  Point, had been eliminated from consideration. 
          The committee was formed at the request of   the 2007 Town Council,  which asked the panel to determine if it would   be financially  beneficial for Jamestown to put up a wind turbine. The   feasibility  study, performed by South Kingstown-based Applied Science   Associates,  presented 146 pages’ worth of answers. 
          However, before selecting a “finalist,”   and formally recommending  that site to the council, the committee   wanted to be sure that there  weren’t any issues that the study had   missed. So, the public was  encouraged to ask questions during a   presentation on the study, the  $55,000 cost of which was shared by the   town and the R.I. Economic  Development Corp. 
          Although such proposals are sometimes   controversial, no one from the  audience of 50-plus people spoke out   against the idea of a wind  turbine. There were numerous questions,   however, about the economics of  the options evaluated by the study –   and many of those questions  involved the concept of “net metering.” 
          Under a state law enacted last June, any   surplus of renewable energy  generated by municipalities on municipally   owned sites may now be sold  to the utility serving the area.   Previously, the surplus in Rhode  Island and other states was eligible   only for conversion into  “renewable electricity” credits, which could   then be bought by electric  utilities seeking to comply with federal   mandates requiring a  percentage of their output to be “green.” 
          The legislation enabling municipalities to   earn cash rebates for  their surplus renewable energy was co-sponsored   by State Rep. Deborah  Ruggiero of Jamestown, who attended the workshop,   and who told the Press, “I  am excited and encouraged by the   work of this committee, and I commend  them for their efforts. Jamestown   could lead the way in this area for  other Rhode Island towns and   cities.” 
          If Jamestown built enough wind turbines,   “we might make so much  money that we won’t have to pay property taxes,”   Committee Chairman Don  Wineberg said, adding, “Or, at least, that’s my   dream.” 
          For now, however, the council must still   decide if a turbine will be built, and how it will be funded. 
          The study evaluated many factors affecting   turbine costs, including  location, expected wind energy at each   location, expected output from  the available wind energy and expected   profit or loss over a 20-year  period, including maintenance and   decommissioning costs. 
          The cost scenarios in the study were built   around 0.8-megawatt  turbines, which would generate only enough power   to offset all the  electricity purchased for town-owned buildings and   infrastructure, such  as streetlights; and 2.0-megawatt turbines, which   would allow the town  to produce a saleable surplus. 
          Examples of the cost scenarios included a   single 0.8-megawatt  turbine at Ft. Getty, which was projected to cost   $2.8 million; a  single 2.0-megawatt turbine at Taylor Point, which   would cost $6.1  million; and three 0.8- megawatt turbines at Beavertail   Point, which  would cost $20.5 million – and operate at a loss. 
          The experts advising the committee   determined that there would have  to be three turbines at Beavertail to   overcome the energy transmission  losses that result whenever generators   are sited far from the nearest  substation. There would be also be   major costs to upgrade existing  power lines and, as Applied Science   consultant Daniel Mendelsohn  pointed out, one of the Beavertail sites   is federally owned, which  means the power from that site wouldn’t be   eligible for netmetering. 
          When asked to explain how the town would   pay for a turbine, Wineberg  said that likely or potential funding   sources include the Economic  Development Corp., which could be counted   on for at least $500,000. A  townissued municipal bond is another   potential source of financing,  with surplus energy sales providing the   income to pay the debt service  and pay off the loan. The town also has   the option of financing a  turbine with a federally backed, tax-free   Clean Renewable Energy Bond,  although it would have to be paid off in   15 years. 
          The Wind Energy Committee will meet   Tuesday, Nov. 17 to discuss the  workshop proceedings, and possibly   select a final site for  recommendation to the Town Council. Besides its   future debate on a  turbine, which will include multiple public   hearings, the council will  face the task of selecting a financing   strategy. 
          If the council approves a wind turbine   project, town voters would be  asked to approve the financing. That   could occur at a special financial  meeting during the winter or early   spring, be put to voters during the  regular budget meeting in June or   be put before the voters as a ballot  question in November. 
          The feasibility study is available at the   Jamestown Philomenian Library or online at www. jamestownri.net. 
          By Phil Zahodiakin